In a nutshell

Nature Communications offers the option to publish the reviewer reports and author rebuttal letters for published papers submitted from January 2016 onwards. Authors are asked to opt in to this scheme upon acceptance of the paper. The anonymity of reviewers is maintained, unless they sign their reports to the authors.

Goals and intentions

Our intention is to open up the peer review process at the journal, and to provide information on the expert reports that led to our editorial decision to publish a paper. Moreover, the reviewer reports also can serve as a background on the merits of a study, and inform about the discussion between authors and our reviewers.

Review process
  • Review requested by
    Authors
  • Reviewer selected by
    Editor, service, or community
  • Public interaction
    No
  • Author response
    Yes
  • Decision
    Binary decision
Review policy
  • Review coverage
    Complete paper
  • Reviewer identity known to
    Editor or service
  • Competing interests
    Checked
Review features
  • Manuscript hosting
    Yes
  • Notes

    Reviewers choose to sign reports; if report is not signed, confidentiality of reviewer is maintained.

  • Eligible reviewers/editors
    Professional Editors invite reviewers to evaluate manuscript.
  • Tags or badges
    No
Results
  • Number of scholarly outputs commented on
    10,000+
  • Metrics
    Rate at which authors are opting in to the publication of the peer review files; author opt-in rate across different research areas.
  • Results summary

    On average, around 60% of our authors are voluntarily opting in to publishing the peer review history of their paper. We believe that this is a very encouraging result, given also the diversity of our content across so many research areas. Looking at the data for different research fields, not surprisingly, there is some variation. In areas where more open peer review is commonplace and reviewers often sign their reports by name, author opt-in is particularly strong. Other areas may not necessarily be that familiar with publishing reviewer reports, and might therefore still be hesitant to do so. However, in almost all research areas the majority of papers that we publish will now contain a peer review file.

  • Results URL
mood_bad
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment