• A project of ASAPbio
    • About
    • Add listing
    • Glossary
    • Blog
    Explore
    Sign in or Register
    Explore

    Transparent peer review, Nature Communications

    Publishing reviewer reports and author responses since 2016

    • Share
    • Bookmark
    • Profile
    • Comments 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Website
    • Leave a comment
    • prev
    • next

    In a nutshell

    Nature Communications offers the option to publish the reviewer reports and author rebuttal letters for published papers submitted from January 2016 onwards. Authors are asked to opt in to this scheme upon acceptance of the paper. The anonymity of reviewers is maintained, unless they sign their reports to the authors.

    Goals and intentions

    Our intention is to open up the peer review process at the journal, and to provide information on the expert reports that led to our editorial decision to publish a paper. Moreover, the reviewer reports also can serve as a background on the merits of a study, and inform about the discussion between authors and our reviewers.

    Types of outputs

    • Journal accepted manuscripts

    Review process

    • Review requested by
      Authors
    • Reviewer selected by
      Editor, service, or community
    • Public interaction
      No
    • Author response
      Yes
    • Decision
      Binary decision

    Review policy

    • Review coverage
      Complete paper
    • Reviewer identity known to
      Editor or service
    • Competing interests
      Checked

    Review features

    • Manuscript hosting
      Yes
    • Notes

      Reviewers choose to sign reports; if report is not signed, confidentiality of reviewer is maintained.

    • Eligible reviewers/editors
      Professional Editors invite reviewers to evaluate manuscript.
    • Tags or badges
      No

    Transparency

    • Double blind
    • Open reports
    • Single blind

    Results

    • Number of scholarly outputs commented on
      10,000+
    • Metrics
      Rate at which authors are opting in to the publication of the peer review files; author opt-in rate across different research areas.
    • Results summary

      On average, around 60% of our authors are voluntarily opting in to publishing the peer review history of their paper. We believe that this is a very encouraging result, given also the diversity of our content across so many research areas. Looking at the data for different research fields, not surprisingly, there is some variation. In areas where more open peer review is commonplace and reviewers often sign their reports by name, author opt-in is particularly strong. Other areas may not necessarily be that familiar with publishing reviewer reports, and might therefore still be hesitant to do so. However, in almost all research areas the majority of papers that we publish will now contain a peer review file.

    • Results URL
      https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms13626
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • X
      • WhatsApp
      • Viber
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • Reddit
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link
      • Share via...
      • Threads
      • Bluesky