Post by Victoria Yan, Iratxe Puebla, and Jessica Polka Preprint reviews hold the potential to build trust in preprints and drive innovation in peer review. However, the variety of platforms available to contribute comments and reviews on preprints means that it can be difficult for readers to gain a clear picture of the process that […]
Here on ReimagineReview, we envision the constant improvement of peer review through experimentation and research. With concurrent research and outcome reporting, the projects we list have the potential to demonstrate whether their approach has improved peer review. The collective efforts of experimental peer review projects to monitor and transparently report on their outcomes will enable […]
Join our mailing list for occasional updates, for instance when we publish new content.
Peer review is deeply embedded into the scientific process, and it serves multiple purposes: giving and receiving feedback, error detection and correction, and filtering and curation. Yet, there’s little evidence that it functions optimally.
Projects listed in ReimagineReview seek to improve or extend this process in inventive ways, making it more open, unbiased, rapid, robust, or accessible.
Project leaders can create a listing for their projects to raise visibility among researchers, funders, journal editors, and more. Registration is free, and you can update your listing over time.