• A project of ASAPbio
    • About
    • Add listing
    • Glossary
    • Blog
    Explore
    Sign in or Register
    Explore

    PeerRef

    Journal-independent open peer review. A single point of peer review to accelerate & expand research

    • Share
    • Bookmark
    • Profile
    • Comments 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Website
    • Leave a comment
    • Review policy
    • prev
    • next

    In a nutshell

    Our vision is for all researchers to access a single point of peer review. Enabling all research to be trusted and accelerated.

    PeerRef is a journal-independent open peer review platform. It organises peer review of preprints and publishes peer review reports. This approach can accelerate research by creating a single point of peer review in the publication process. The platform also aims to expand research. It does this by reducing the barriers to accessing peer review and asks referees to focus on academic rigour, rather than perceived impact.

    Referees are responsible for making the decisions on manuscripts. The author has multiple options following peer review:

    - Share the refereed manuscript with the community
    - Submit the manuscript to a partner journal
    - Submit the manuscript and consolidated review reports to a non-partner journal

    Goals and intentions

    PeerRef offers Journal-independent open peer review of preprints.

    • More diverse research can access peer review.
    • Constructive feedback can replace journal rejection.
    • increase trust by allowing everyone to read the reviews.
    • The publication process will be more efficient by creating a single point of peer review before journal submission.

    Project status

    • Active

    Types of outputs

    • Preprints

    Review process

    • Review requested by
      Authors
    • Reviewer selected by
      Editor, service, or community
    • Public interaction
      No
    • Author response
      Yes
    • Decision
      Other scale or rating

    Review policy

    • Review coverage
      Complete paper
    • Reviewer identity known to
      Public
    • Competing interests
      Displayed

    Social Networks

    • LinkedIn
    • X

    Review features

    • Manuscript hosting
      No
    • Review of code or data
      Yes
    • Eligible reviewers/editors
      Contacted by the service.

    Transparency

    • Open identities
    • Open interaction
    • Open reports

    Results

    • Number of scholarly outputs commented on
      10-100
    • Metrics
      usage and participation is tracked
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • X
      • WhatsApp
      • Viber
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • Reddit
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link
      • Share via...
      • Threads
      • Bluesky