• A project of ASAPbio
    • About
    • Add listing
    • Glossary
    • Blog
    Explore
    Sign in or Register
    Explore

    Grassroots Journals

    Open Post-publication review organized like a journal

    • Share
    • Bookmark
    • Profile
    • Comments 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Website
    • Leave a comment
    • Review policy
    • prev
    • next

    In a nutshell

    Grassroots Journals assess the quality of scientific studies and aim to make it irrelevant where a study was originally published.

    A grassroots journal collects, assess, categorizes and ranks all articles relevant for a specific topic/community. Thus it brings together articles that are now spread over many publications and provides a better access to the scientific literature. It does not publish articles, but only reviews them.
    Post-publication review means that the assessments are up to date. It includes articles of all quality levels by quantifying the quality; this avoids making multiple reviews for multiple journals. All assessments are open access and the code open source.

    Goals and intentions

    Breaking the power of the traditional publishers and bringing the assessment what good science is back to the scientific community.

    Types of outputs

    • Other scholarly outputs

    Review process

    • Review requested by
      Non-authors
    • Reviewer selected by
      Self-nominated
    • Public interaction
      Yes
    • Author response
      No
    • Decision
      None

    Review policy

    • Review coverage
      Complete paper, Specific aspects
    • Reviewer identity known to
      Editor or service
    • Competing interests
      Not included

    Social Networks

    • X

    Review features

    • Manuscript hosting
      No
    • Eligible reviewers/editors
      The editors of a Grassroots Journal invite experts to review, but everyone else is also welcome to add comments.

    Transparency

    • Open identities
    • Open interaction
    • Open participation
    • Open reports
    • Single blind

    Results

    • Number of scholarly outputs commented on
      1-10
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • X
      • WhatsApp
      • Viber
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • Reddit
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link
      • Share via...
      • Threads
      • Bluesky