• A project of ASAPbio
    • About
    • Add listing
    • Glossary
    • Blog
    Explore
    Sign in or Register
    Explore

    CrowdPeer

    Peer review powered by the crowd.

    • Share
    • Bookmark
    • Profile
    • Comments 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Website
    • Leave a comment
    • Review policy
    • prev
    • next

    In a nutshell

    The Crowdpeer platform facilitates the open peer review of preprints. We provide a universal structure for reviews, separating the objective, quality related critiques of a paper from it’s perceived impact. Anyone can add a paper summary, highlight strengths and weaknesses of a paper and reply to others’ contributions. This encourages all aspects of traditional peer review to be covered - not only negative comments. A comment voting system allows for members of the community to collectively filter reviewer contributions, highlighting the most important comments and providing a more impartial final review. Through this system, reviewers who make valued contributions are also able to build their reputations within the community.

    Goals and intentions

    • To provide a platform for the open review of preprints and engagement of a diverse group of reviewers.
    • To employ a universal structure for reviews in order to standardise the review process, make reviews more impartial & provide an educational tool for reviewers.
    • To encourage engagement between reviewers using an up-voting system; allowing the community to learn from each other, removing bias and ensuring the most informative comments are heard.
    • To provide recognition for reviewers’ contributions - allowing them to build their reputations within the community and benefit professionally.

    Project status

    • Completed

    Types of outputs

    • Preprints

    Review process

    • Review requested by
      Non-authors
    • Reviewer selected by
      Self-nominated
    • Public interaction
      Yes
    • Author response
      Yes
    • Decision
      Other scale or rating

    Review policy

    • Review coverage
      Complete paper
    • Reviewer identity known to
      Public
    • Competing interests
      Not included

    Social Networks

    • X

    Review features

    • Manuscript hosting
      No
    • Notes
      • Reviewer performance metrics
    • Eligible reviewers/editors
      Anyone (reviews are open)
    • Tags or badges
      Yes

    Transparency

    • Open identities
    • Open interaction
    • Open participation
    • Open reports

    Results

    • Metrics
      Yes - we track the number of reviews and quality (through upvoting) of reviews on a paper.
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • X
      • WhatsApp
      • Viber
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • Reddit
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link
      • Share via...
      • Threads
      • Bluesky