• A project of ASAPbio
    • About
    • Add listing
    • Glossary
    • Blog
    Explore
    Sign in or Register
    Explore

    Researchers.One

    A peer-review publication platform created by researchers, for researchers.

    • Share
    • Bookmark
    • Profile
    • Comments 0
    • prev
    • next
    • Website
    • Leave a comment
    • prev
    • next

    In a nutshell

    The primary goal of researchers.one is to facilitate high quality scholarship without
    the pitfalls of a “guild-like” system. Specifically, researchers.one separates the scholarly aspects of peer review from the administrative by offering researchers the 3 A’s:

    • Autonomy to pursue their passions,
    • Authority to develop and disseminate their ideas and
    • Access to engage with the international community of scholars.

    Some basic attributes of the platform include: there are no editors, there are no
    accept-reject decisions or other barriers to publication, and there are no barriers to access. In removing these barriers, the researchers.one autonomous publishing model gives authors total control over the publication process from start to finish, which includes selecting the mode of peer review (public access or traditional), choosing the invited reviewers (if traditional peer review is chosen), determining whether and how to address reviewer comments, and deciding whether or not to publish their work. Once published, articles are publicly accessible on the site, with options for other users to provide non-anonymous commentary and post-publication peer review. Ultimately, the quality of published work must stand on its own, without the crutch of impact factors, journal prestige, ‘likes’, ‘thumbs up’, or the artificial stamp of approval signaled by the label ‘peer review’.

    Goals and intentions

    researchers.one is dedicated to providing a platform that promotes transparency, openness, fairness, and creativity while allowing researchers and scholars to create, communicate, and improve their work at their own discretion.

    Project status

    • Active

    Types of outputs

    • Other scholarly outputs
    • Preprints
    • Privately shared manuscripts

    Review process

    • Review requested by
      Non-authors
    • Reviewer selected by
      Self-nominated
    • Public interaction
      Yes
    • Author response
      Yes
    • Decision
      None

    Review policy

    • Review coverage
      Complete paper, Specific aspects
    • Reviewer identity known to
      Editor or service
    • Competing interests
      Not included

    Social Networks

    • X

    Review features

    • Manuscript hosting
      Yes
    • Review of code or data
      Yes
    • Eligible reviewers/editors
      Pre-publication reviews are done by the reviewers selected by the author. Post-publication review is open to public.
    • Tags or badges
      No
    • Cost
      10
    • Explanation of cost
      Cost of publishing per article

    Transparency

    • Open interaction
    • Open participation
    • Open reports

    Results

    • Number of scholarly outputs commented on
      Unknown
  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Leave a Reply · Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Cart

      • Facebook
      • X
      • WhatsApp
      • Viber
      • Telegram
      • LinkedIn
      • Tumblr
      • Reddit
      • VKontakte
      • Mail
      • Copy link
      • Share via...
      • Threads
      • Bluesky